Bernard McFadden v. EDWARD BITTINGER, Captain and/or Disciplinary Hearing Officer of Kershaw CI

17-6772Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20 de out. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6772
BERNARD MCFADDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDWARD BITTINGER, Captain and/or Disciplinary Hearing Officer of Kershaw
CI; TONY SMITH, Captain of Kershaw CI, in their individual or personal
capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (2:15-cv-02507-JMC)
Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 20, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Parsons Kelley, RICHARDSON
PLOWDEN, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. McFadden v. Bittinger, No. 2:15-cv-02507-
JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2017 & May 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.