Gerald D. Fuller v. Warden Frank B. Bishop, Jr.

17-6423Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 de set. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6423
GERALD D. FULLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; F.S.C. II LARRY D. HANLIN;
SUPERVISOR; KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-02524-WMN)
Submitted: August 30, 2017 Decided: September 22, 2017
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald D. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment
to defendants in his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying his motion to
reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fuller v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-02524-
WMN (D. Md. Jan. 27 & Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.