United States of America v. Michael Paul Puzey, a/k/a Big Pete

17-6316Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de jul. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6316
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL PAUL PUZEY, a/k/a Big Pete,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00057-GMG-RWT-16;
3:00-cr-00064-GMG-2)
Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: July 25, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Paul Puzey, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States
Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Paul Puzey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to alter
or amend judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), in which he sought reconsideration of the
court’s prior order denying relief on Puzey’s Fed. R Civ. P. 60(d) (3) motion challenging
his underlying conviction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Puzey, Nos. 3:00-cr-00057-GMG-RWT-16; 3:00-cr-00064-GMG-2 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 21,
2017). We deny Puzey’s motions for appointment of counsel and for bail or release
pending appeal; we grant Puzey’s motion to file a reply to the Government’s objection to
his motion for release. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.