Leonard L. Clay v. KENNETH RILEY, ILA Local Union 1422

17-2239Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de mai. de 2018

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2239
LEONARD L. CLAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KENNETH RILEY, ILA Local Union 1422,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:16-cv-03038-DCN)
Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Allan Riley Holmes, Sr., Cheryl H. Ledbetter, GIBBS
& HOLMES, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Leonard L. Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action
alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b). Because Clay’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Clay has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson
v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important
document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.