Westmoreland Coal Company v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

17-1996Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 de mar. de 2018

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1996
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY,
Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; PATSY MAGGARD,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (16-0555 BLA)
Submitted: March 20, 2018 Decided: March 22, 2018
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul E. Frampton, Fazal A. Shere, BOWLES RICE LLP, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Petitioner. Evan B. Smith, APPALACHIAN CITIZENS’ LAW CENTER, Whitesburg,
Kentucky; Joseph Allman, ALLMAN LAW LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Westmoreland Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits
pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-944 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, No. 16-0555 BLA
(B.R.B. June 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.