Norman Ruffin v. (first Name Unknown) Medical Doctor Calhoun, Lvcc

16-7275Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 de fev. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7275
NORMAN RUFFIN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
(FIRST NAME UNKNOWN) MEDICAL DOCTOR CALHOUN, LVCC; (FIRST
NAME UNKNOWN) MEDICAL DOCTOR CLEMENTS, LVCC; (FIRST NAME
UNKNOWN) MEDICAL DOCTOR LANGFORD, LVCC; (FIRST NAME
UNKNOWN) MEDICAL NURSE HIGHTOWER, LVCC; (FIRST NAME
UNKNOWN) MEDICAL DIRECTOR D. GOODE, LVCC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:16-cv-00403-RGD-RJK)
Submitted: February 14, 2017 Decided: February 23, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norman Ruffin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Norman Ruffin appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for
failure to comply with its prior order. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b). We review a district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b)
for abuse of discretion. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95
(4th Cir. 1989). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse
of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Ruffin v. Calhoun, No. 2:16-cv-00403-RGD-
RJK (E.D. Va. Sept. 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.