United States of America v. Michael E. Williams

16-7134Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11 de jan. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7134
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1)
Submitted: January 5, 2017 Decided: January 11, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael E. Williams appeals the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Williams, No. 3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.