Daniel H. King v. Charles Ratledge

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6582
DANIEL H. KING,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
CHARLES RATLEDGE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-hc-02183-FL)
Submitted: September 20, 2016 Decided: September 27, 2016
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel H. King, a District of Columbia Code offender
civilly committed under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and
Safety Act, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Ratledge,
No. 5:15-hc-02183-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2016). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --