Frank Vigil, Jr. v. JOHN WALRACH, Assistant Warden

16-6050Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de set. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6050
FRANK VIGIL, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN WALRACH, Assistant Warden; WALTER SWEENY, Unit Manager
B-Building; RANDALL MATHENA, Superintendent and former
Warden of ROSP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:15-cv-00063-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: August 31, 2016 Decided: September 29, 2016
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank Vigil, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Rankin Herring,
Attorney General, Laura Haeberle Cahill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Frank Vigil, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Vigil v. Walrach, No. 7:15-cv-00063-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va.
Dec. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.