L. Ruther v. Barry Gash

16-2068Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de fev. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2068
L. RUTHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARRY GASH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order summarily
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court. Ruther v. Gash, No. 1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN
(E.D. Va. filed Aug. 19, 2016; entered Aug. 22, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.