United States of America v. Noe Pineda-Albarron, a/k/a Primo, a/k/a Pedro Martinez Flores, a/k/a Noe Albarron-Pineda

15-7204Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 de fev. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7204
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NOE PINEDA-ALBARRON, a/k/a Primo, a/k/a Pedro Martinez
Flores, a/k/a Noe Albarron-Pineda,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon,
Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00029-NKM-1)
Submitted: January 26, 2016 Decided: February 1, 2016
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Noe Pineda-Albarron, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Noe Pineda-Albarron appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Pineda-Albarron, No. 3:10-cr-00029-NKM-
1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.