Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Dr. Onoha; Unknown

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6876
EDDIE GAMBLE, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. ONOHA; UNKNOWN DEFENDANT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03242-FL)
Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Gamble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Gamble, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing without prejudice under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) his action filed pursuant to Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Gamble’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Gamble has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Gamble’s
motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --