Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Vernessa Craddock

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6875
EDDIE GAMBLE, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VERNESSA CRADDOCK,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
L. T. WRIGHT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03176-FL)
Submitted: September 29, 2015 Decided: October 15, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Gamble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lockridge, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Gamble, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on several postjudgment motions in his
action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On appeal, we
confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gamble’s informal brief
does not challenge the basis for the district court’s
disposition, Gamble has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Gamble’s motion for
appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --