Robin Virginia Meadow Collins v. Pat Green

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6169
ROBIN VIRGINIA MEADOW COLLINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAT GREEN; ELLIOTT PANNELL; H. M. EDWARDS; JANELLE THORNE;
SERGEANT PERRY; SERGEANT WHITLEY; SGT. JOHNSON;
SGT. WILSON; OFFICER KEMP; NURSE MARIA; LOIS VERZALL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03109-F)
Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robin Virginia Meadow Collins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robin Virginia Meadow Collins seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing without prejudice her 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) civil action. Collins’ complaint was dismissed for
failure to comply with the district court’s order directing that
she particularize her claims and provide information relative to
the exhaustion of her administrative remedies. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949).
The order Collins seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order because it is
possible for her to cure the deficiencies identified by the
district court by filing an amended complaint. See Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066–67
(4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --