Harald Schmidt v. Steven Hunsberger; John Burk

15-1340Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11 de set. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1340
HARALD SCHMIDT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEVEN HUNSBERGER; JOHN BURK,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MICHAEL BURKE,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01372-LO-MSN; 1:14-cv-01373-LO-MSN)
Submitted: August 31, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harald Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Notz, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Harald Schmidt appeals the district court’s orders
consolidating his cases against Officers Steven Hunsberger and
John Burk and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints
against the officers. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. See A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater
Constr. Corp., 559 F.2d 928, 933 (4th Cir. 1977) (identifying
district court’s broad discretion in consolidation issues);
United States v. Buckner, 473 F.3d 551, 554-55 (4th Cir. 2007)
(discussing apparent authority to consent to search). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.