14-7608•Rodney David Young v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
14-7608Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de abr. de 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7608
RODNEY DAVID YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LIEUTENANT
PATRICK; CAPTAIN WRIGHT; OFFICER SABRINA RISHER; OFFICER
JEFFREY MOSLEY; MS. VALERIE JACKSON; MS. J. BROWN;
SERGEANT GREEN; WARDEN LEVERN COHEN, et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-02247-TMC)
Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 2, 2015
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney David Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rodney David Young appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. As to Young’s
claim challenging the propriety of his prison disciplinary
proceeding, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Young v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No.
1:14-cv-02247-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2014). Young has forfeited
appellate review of his remaining claims by failing to raise
them in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.