Roger L. Ervin v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; SERGEANT FINK

14-7320Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de abr. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7320
ROGER L. ERVIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; SERGEANT FINK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03337-ELH)
Submitted: March 30, 2015 Decided: April 2, 2015
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Len Ervin, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Roger L. Ervin seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying in part his motion for discovery. This Court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The order Ervin seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Nor
could it have been certified for immediate appealability under
Rule 54(b). In re Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 287-88 (4th Cir. 2005);
Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d
345, 347-48 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.