TIEMOKO COULIBALY, Dr.; FATOU GAYE-COULIBALY, Dr. v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.a.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1594
TIEMOKO COULIBALY, Dr.; FATOU GAYE-COULIBALY, Dr.,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
FANNIE MAE; NRT-MID-ATLANTIC TITLE SERVICE, LLC; LONG &
FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INCORPORATED; FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY; FAACS; GUARDIAN FUNDING; INTEGRATED
ASSET SERVICES; SIMCOX AND BARCLAY, LLP; JOHN AND JANE DOE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:10-cv-03517-DKC)
Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tiemoko Coulibaly, Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly, Appellants Pro Se. Chad
King, John Sears Simcox, SIMCOX & BARCLAY, Annapolis, Maryland,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Tiemoko Coulibaly and Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly appeal from
the district court’s orders denying their motions filed pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Coulibaly v. JP
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:10-cv-03517-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 13 &
June 16, 2014). We deny the cross-motions to strike and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --