Jean R. Destin; Charisse M. Destin v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE, Defunct; PNC BANK, N.A.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1547
JEAN R. DESTIN; CHARISSE M. DESTIN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE, Defunct; PNC BANK, N.A.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-1548
PNC BANK National Association, c/o Samuel I. White, PC,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEAN R. DESTIN; CHARISSE M. DESTIN,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00332-REP; 3:14-cv-00373-REP)
Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam.
Charisse M. Destin, Jean R. Destin, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In Appeal No. 14-1547, Jean R. Destin and Charisse M.
Destin seek to appeal the district court’s orders denying their
motion for a temporary restraining order and warning that their
action would be dismissed in thirty days if they did not submit
a pleading setting forth a valid basis for subject matter
jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-
46 (1949). The orders the Destins seek to appeal are neither
final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
In Appeal No. 14-1548, the Destins noted an appeal in
a civil action before the district court had entered any orders.
Because there is no appealable order for us to review, we deny
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --