Rodney David Young v. Christopher Griffin; Tammy Hamilton; Dr. Mary Hammond; Lieutenant D. Sisco

13-7940Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit5 de mar. de 2014

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7940
RODNEY DAVID YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER GRIFFIN; TAMMY HAMILTON; DR. MARY HAMMOND;
LIEUTENANT D. SISCO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-03009-TMC)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney David Young, Appellant Pro Se. Nathaniel Heyward
Clarkson, III, Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL &
COULTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; Russell W. Harter, Jr.,
CHAPMAN, HARTER & HARTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rodney David Young appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Young v. Griffin, No. 1:12-cv-03009-TMC (D.S.C. Nov. 15, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.