Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Vernessa Craddock

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7735
EDDIE GAMBLE, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VERNESSA CRADDOCK,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
L. T. WRIGHT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03176-FL)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Gamble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lockridge, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Gamble, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), and denying his motions for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Gamble v. Craddock, No. 5:11-ct-03176-FL
(E.D.N.C. May 28, 2013 & Aug. 21, 2013). We deny as moot
Gamble’s motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --