Anita Homagain; Ishwar Prasad Timilsina v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2254
ANITA HOMAGAIN; ISHWAR PRASAD TIMILSINA,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: February 11, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anita Homagain, Ishwar Prasad Timilsina, Petitioners Pro Se.
Brianne Whelan Cohen, Yamileth G. Davila, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Anita Homagain and Ishwar Prasad Timilsina, natives
and citizens of Nepal, petition for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion for
reconsideration of the denial of their motion to reopen. We
deny the petition for review.
A motion to reconsider asserts that the Board made an
error in its earlier decision, and the movant must specify the
error of fact or law in the Board’s prior decision. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (2013). The denial of a motion to
reconsider is reviewed for abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(a) (2013); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th
Cir. 2009); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006).
We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the documents
accompanying the motion to reopen and the Petitioners’ motion to
reconsider. We conclude that the Board did not abuse its
discretion.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --