In re: MARY KAY CANARTE ------------------------------------ JAY HAWKINS v. Isiah Leggett

13-2236Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit5 de mar. de 2014

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2236
In re: MARY KAY CANARTE
------------------------------------
JAY HAWKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ISIAH LEGGETT; MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; ARTHUR M.
WALLENSTEIN, Director; MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; ARTHUR M. WALLENSTEIN,
Personally,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:12-cv-00623-AW)
Submitted: February 21, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Prestigiacomo Via, Paul
F. Leonard, Jr., COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland,
for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jay Hawkins appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment to the Appellees, dismissing his
employment discrimination complaint and denying reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hawkins v. Leggett, No. 8:12-cv-00623-AW (D. Md. June
24, 2013; Sept. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.