JANELLE HILL, Individually v. Medcon, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2169
JANELLE HILL, Individually and as the Next Friend of
S.A.H.; WILLIAM HILL, Individually and as the Next Friend
of S.A.H.,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC.,
Defendant – Appellee,
v.
MEDCON, INC.,
Intervenor – Appellant,
and
KENNETH EDWARD LABOWITZ, Guardian ad litem for S.A.H.,
Party Below.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00463-CMH-TRJ)
Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 21, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Joshua Harry Erlich, ERLICH LAW OFFICE, Arlington, Virginia, for
Appellant. Janelle Hill, Ozona, Florida; William Hill, Norfolk,
Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN
SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Medcon, Inc. appeals the district court’s order
denying its motion to intervene in a closed civil action. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hill v. Sanofi-Aventis, No. 1:09-cv-00463-CMH-TRJ (E.D.
Va. filed Aug. 13, 2013; entered Aug. 14, 2013). Medcon’s
motion to strike Janelle Hill’s informal brief is denied. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --