Ana Mahu; Denis Igorevich Zernyukov v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1503
ANA MAHU; DENIS IGOREVICH ZERNYUKOV,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: September 16, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander J. Segal, GRINBERG & SEGAL, P.L.L.C., New York, New
York, for Petitioners. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney
General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Gregory M. Kelch,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ana Mahu, a native and citizen of Moldova, and Denis
Igorevich Zernyukov, a native and citizen of Russia, petition
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) denying their motion to reopen. We have thoroughly
reviewed the record, including Zernyukov’s affidavit and his
documentary evidence and conclude that the record evidence does
not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative
findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2006), and that
the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24
(1992); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Mahu (B.I.A. Apr. 9,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --