Allen Wright v. Dr. Bearden; Dr. Moore

12-7995Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de abr. de 2013

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7995
ALLEN WRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. BEARDEN; DR. MOORE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (1:11-cv-03307-TLW)
Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN &
PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Allen Wright appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, denying his
motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motions. Limiting our review to the issues raised in the
informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the district
court’s orders. Wright v. Bearden, No. 1:11-cv-03307-TLW
(D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2012; dated Nov. 2, 2012, entered Nov. 5, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.