Christopher Bullard; Tony Ginor Sampson v. Reuben Franklin Young

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7538
CHRISTOPHER BULLARD; TONY GINOR SAMPSON,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03093-FL)
Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Bullard, Tony Ginor Sampson, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying
relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Bullard v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03093-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2012).
We deny Appellants’ motion to compel an answer and for grant of
motions filed in the district court. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --