Steven Louis Barnes v. Judge William Keesley

12-7460Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16 de nov. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7460
STEVEN LOUIS BARNES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JUDGE WILLIAM KEESLEY; STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN WILSON;
ATTORNEY DANIEL PLYLER; ATTORNEY GREGORY; STATE OFFICIALS,
only in their official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief
District Judge. (4:11-cv-02969-MBS)
Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 16, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Louis Barnes appeals the district court’s
orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice and denying reconsideration.* We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Keesley,
4:11-cv-02969-MBS (D.S.C. June 27 & July 25, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the magistrate judge issued a report and
recommendation that the complaint be dismissed, the district
court relied on different reasoning in dismissing the complaint.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.