Adam Clayton Pugh v. Sheriff John Ingram; Captain Davis; Captain Evans

12-7174Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18 de dez. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7174
ADAM CLAYTON PUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF JOHN INGRAM; CAPTAIN DAVIS; CAPTAIN EVANS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03027-FL)
Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 18, 2012
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adam Clayton Pugh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Adam Clayton Pugh appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Pugh v. Ingram, No. 5:12-
ct-03027-FL (E.D.N.C. July 3, 2012). We deny Pugh’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.