United States of America v. Jeltress Chenico Williamson

12-7116Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 de dez. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7116
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JELTRESS CHENICO WILLIAMSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:98-cr-00190-JAB-1)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeltress Chenico Williamson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jeltress Chenico Williamson appeals the district
court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for a sentence reduction. On appeal, we confine our review to
the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Williamson’s informal brief does not challenge
the basis for the district court’s disposition, Williamson has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.