Thomas L. Switzer v. Sergeant Dean, a/k/a Officer Dean

12-2274Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de fev. de 2013

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2274
THOMAS L. SWITZER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
TOWN OF STANLEY; DOUG PURDHAM, Mayor; OFFICER BROWN; MARK
BELTON, Page County Administrator; JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff;
DEPUTY HAMMER; PAGE COUNTY JAIL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW)
Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor,
TAYLOR ZUNKER MILNOR & CARTER LTD, Charlottesville, Virginia,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying
various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Switzer v. Dean, No.
5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. Aug. 10 & Oct. 12, 2012). We
deny Switzer’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.