TIEMOKO COULIBALY, Dr.; FATOU GAYE-COULIBALY, Dr. v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.a.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2230
TIEMOKO COULIBALY, Dr.; FATOU GAYE-COULIBALY, Dr.,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; FANNIE MAE; LONG & FOSTER REAL
ESTATE, INC.; NRT-MID-ATLANTIC TITLE SERVICE, LLC, now
known as Mid-Atlantic Settlement Services LLC; FIRST
AMERICAN TITLE; FAACS; GUARDIAN FUNDING; INTEGRATED ASSET
SERVICES; SIMCOX AND BARCLAY, LLP; JOHN AND JANE DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:10-cv-03517-DKC)
Submitted: March 29, 2013 Decided: May 1, 2013
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tiemoko Coulibaly, Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly, Appellants Pro Se.
Chad King, John Sears Simcox, SIMCOX & BARCLAY, Annapolis,
Maryland; Timothy Guy Casey, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY G. CASEY, PA,
Rockville, Maryland; Sarah F. Lacey, Kimberly Anne Manuelides,
Indira Kavita Sharma, SAUL EWING, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland;
Brent M. Ahalt, Jennifer Anne Sherburne, MCNAMEE, HOSEA,
JERNIGAN, KIM, GREENAN & WALKER, PA, Greenbelt, Maryland; Thomas

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Althauser, Seth Philip Kleiner, ECCLESTON & WOLF PC, Hanover
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Dr. Tiemoko Coulibaly and Dr. Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly
appeal the district court’s orders granting the motions to
dismiss their claims filed by Defendants other than JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), granting in part and denying in part
the motion to dismiss filed by Chase, denying their motions for
recusal and reconsideration, and granting Chase’s motion for
summary judgment in their civil action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Coulibaly v. JP
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:10-cv-03517-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 7,
2012; Dec. 28, 2011; Dec. 12, 2011; Sept. 16, 2011 & Aug. 8,
2011). We deny Chase’s motion to strike the informal brief and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --