In re: THADDEUS D. WILLIAMS v. Thaddeus D. Williams; Michele B. Williams

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1663
In re: THADDEUS D. WILLIAMS,
Debtor
-----------------------------------
SANDRA S. SPAIN, Sandra S. Spain Sprouse; TREADEGAR
CONSTRUCTION, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THADDEUS D. WILLIAMS; MICHELE B. WILLIAMS,
Defendants – Appellants,
v.
ROY M. TERRY, JR., Liquidating Trustee for Treadegar
Construction, LLC,
Movant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00154-REP; 3:11-cv-00868-REP; 09-
36121-KRH; 10-03117-KRH)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thaddeus D. and Michele B. Williams, Appellants Pro Se. John
Craig Smith, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Thaddeus D. Williams and Michele B. Williams appeal
from the district court’s order finding that they lacked
standing to appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order approving a
settlement agreement. Because the terms of the settlement
agreement have been consummated, this appeal is moot. See In re
Stadium Mgt. Corp., 895 F.2d 845, 847 (1st Cir. 1990) (“Absent a
stay, the court must dismiss a pending appeal as moot because
the court has no remedy that it can fashion even if it would
have determined the issues differently.”). Accordingly, we
grant Roy Terry’s motion to dismiss, and dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --