Steven Karl Edward Bradford v. OFFICER E. PRUITT, Co II, 3-11 shift

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7179
STEVEN KARL EDWARD BRADFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER E. PRUITT, Co II, 3-11 shift; LIEUTENANT C.
WIDDOWSON, 3-11 shift; SERGEANT KESTLER, 3-11 shift, each in
his individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:10-cv-03619-WDQ)
Submitted: January 30, 2012 Decided: February 15, 2012
Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Karl Edward Bradford, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah W. Rice,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Karl Edward Bradford appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Bradford v. Pruitt, No. 1:10-cv-03619-WDQ (D.
Md. Aug. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --