Romaine Francis v. C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, in his capacity as Sheriff for the City of Richmond

11-6959Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18 de out. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6959
ROMAINE FRANCIS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, in his capacity as Sheriff for the
City of Richmond; SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF
RICHMOND; ANDERSON, Medical Worker; ROBERTSON, Captain of
the City of Richmond Sheriff's Department,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
STANLEY NELSON FURMAN, Doctor,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00235-REP)
Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Romaine Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, William
Daniel Prince, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Romaine Francis appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Francis v. Woody, No.
3:09-cv-00235-REP (E.D. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.