Michael T. Stephens v. Gary Kubic

11-6721Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 de nov. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6721
MICHAEL T. STEPHENS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GARY KUBIC; PHILIP A. FOOT; CHARLERS ALLEN; JO ANN DEBOE;
CHARLES BUCH, Doctor; NURSE HOLDEN; NURSE CARLISE; SUSAN
FOOT; PAROLE AGENT ROWELL; SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (4:08-cv-00329-CMC)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael T. Stephens, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron,
Jr., GRIFFITH & SADLER, PA, Beaufort, South Carolina; Elliott T.
Halio, HALIO & HALIO, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael T. Stephens appeals the district court’s order
denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), (d) motion
for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Stephens v.
Kubic, No. 4:08-cv-00329-CMC (D.S.C. May 16, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.