Kendrick V. Alston v. Winthrop University Police Department

11-6101Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 de mai. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6101
KENDRICK V. ALSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; ROCK HILL CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT; OFFICER DEWAYNE BUNCH; OFFICER JOHN RANIER;
OFFICER MIKE SMOTHERS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (8:09-cv-01130-RMG)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kendrick V. Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, TERRY B.
MILLAR, LLC, Rock Hill, South Carolina; David Leon Morrison,
MORRISON LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kendrick V. Alston appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and the court’s
order denying discovery. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Alston v. Winthrop Univ. Police
Dep’t, No. 8:09-cv-01130-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2010; Jan. 14,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.