In re: GEORGE VAN WAGNER v. Branch Banking & Trust Company, et al

11-2238Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 de abr. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2238
In re: GEORGE VAN WAGNER,
Debtor,
--------------------------------
GEORGE VAN WAGNER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, et al; ATLAS TRI-STATE, SPE,
LLC; PILL & PILL LLC, a/k/a David P. Pill,
Defendants – Appellees,
VANWOOD, LLC; HICKORY RIDGE, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY;
SECURITY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Debtors – Appellees,
and
CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, for George Van Wagner; UNITED STATES
TRUSTEE; CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, for Hickory Ridge and Vanwood,
Trustees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00075-JPB-DJJ; 3:08-bk-00435;
3:07-bk-01671; 3:07-bk-01251; 3:10-ap-00021; 3:10-ap-00046)

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 24, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Van Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. William L. Hallam,
ROSENBERG, MARTIN & GREENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Kathy
Santa Barbara, SANTA BARBARA LAW OFFICES, PLLC, Martinsburg,
West Virginia; Danielle M. Waltz, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH &
BONASSO, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
George Van Wagner appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a stay of proceedings in the bankruptcy
court pending appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Van Wagner v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.
Nos. 3:11-cv-00075-JPB-DJJ; 3:08-bk-00435; 3:07-bk-01671; 3:07-
bk-01251; 3:10-ap-00021; 3:10-ap-00046 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 1,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.