Alicia M. Dennis v. BANK UNITED, Assignee of FDIC as Receiver for Bank United, FSB

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2106
ALICIA M. DENNIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK UNITED, Assignee of FDIC as Receiver for Bank United, FSB;
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING,
LP,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
STEVEN HAROLD GREENFELD, Chapter 7 Trustee,
Trustee.
No. 11-2109
ALICIA M. DENNIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; S. PRINCE AURORA, as
Trustee for Aurora Mortgage; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
STEVEN HAROLD GREENFELD, Chapter 7 Trustee,

-- 1 of 4 --

2
Trustee.
No. 11-2110
ALICIA M. DENNIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
STEVEN HAROLD GREENFELD, Chapter 7 Trustee,
Trustee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:10-cv-03147-RWT; 8:10-cv-03151-RWT; 8:10-cv-03152-
RWT; 09-33957 WIL; 10-00303 WIL; 10-00304 WIL; 10-00305 WIL)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 24, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alicia M. Dennis, Appellant Pro Se. John Sears Simcox, SIMCOX &
BARCLAY, Annapolis, Maryland; S. Prince Aurora, Vienna,
Virginia, Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 2 of 4 --

3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 3 of 4 --

4
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Alicia M. Dennis
appeals the district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy
court’s orders dismissing her complaint filed in the underlying
bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Dennis v. Bank United, Dennis v. U.S.
Bank, National Assoc., Dennis v. Bank of America NA, Nos. 8:10-
cv-03147-RWT; 8:10-cv-03151-RWT; 8:10-cv-03152-RWT; 09-33957
WIL; 10-00303 WIL; 10-00304 WIL; 10-00305 WIL (D. Md. Sept. 9,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 4 of 4 --