James L. Roudabush v. Thomas M. Belk, Jr.

11-1968Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13 de fev. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1968
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THOMAS M. BELK, JR.; BELK STORES, INC.; JAN W. WALKE;
HARNEY; SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SHERIFF; WILLIAM NEELY; JOHN
DOE, Loss Prevention Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00255-GCM)
Submitted: January 17, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James L. Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James L. Roudabush appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Belk,
No. 3:11-cv-00255-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8 & 19, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.