Brian Bacchus v. Southeastern Mechanical Services, Incorporated

11-1890Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 de nov. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1890
BRIAN BACCHUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTHEASTERN MECHANICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:10-
cv-01684-RWT)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Bacchus, Appellant Pro Se. David W. Long-Daniels, Natasha
L. Wilson, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; John
Francis Scalia, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Brian Bacchus appeals the district court’s order
granting appellee’s summary judgment motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Bacchus’ motion for a subpoena and affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bacchus v. Southeastern Mech. Servs.,
Inc., No. 8:10-cv-01684-RWT (D. Md. July 21, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.