Derek N. Jarvis v. Fedex Office & Print Services, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1214
DEREK N. JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FEDEX OFFICE & PRINT SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:08-cv-01694-DKC)
Submitted: July 25, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. David Samuel Panzer, Eric C.
Rowe, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Certiorari dismissed, January 9, 2012

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion to reconsider and granting summary
judgment against him in his civil action. On appeal, Jarvis
contests the denial of his motion to reconsider the court’s
earlier denial of his spoliation of evidence claim, and the
denial of his claim of discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Servs., Inc.,
No. 8:08-cv-01694-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 7, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --