Elsibeth Brandee McCoy v. STEVE CANTERBURY, Administrative Director for Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

11-1017Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit5 de mai. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1017
ELSIBETH BRANDEE MCCOY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STEVE CANTERBURY, Administrative Director for Supreme Court
of Appeals of West Virginia,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA; CABELL COUNTY
COURTHOUSE; BARBRA WILLS, Courthouse Administrator,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00368)
Submitted: May 2, 2011 Decided: May 5, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elsibeth Brandee McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Hedges,
Stephanie Shepherd, BYRNE, HEDGES & LYONS, Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Elsibeth Brandee McCoy appeals the district court’s
order dismissing her action filed under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(West 2003 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for
the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Canterbury,
No. 3:10-cv-00368 (S.D. W. Va. Dec. 20 & 21, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.