10-7195•David Howell v. Officer C. L. Booyer; Cumberland County Sheriff’s Department
10-7195Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 de abr. de 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7195
DAVID HOWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER C. L. BOOYER; CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03043-FL)
Submitted: March 17, 2011 Decided: April 1, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell,
MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURGE & BOUGHMAN,
Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Howell appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Howell v. Booyer, No. 5:09-ct-03043-FL (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.