Henry Burgess v. Lynn Martin; James B. Ellisor; Jim Hodges; Carroll A. Campbell, Jr.; William Doug Catoe

10-7191Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de dez. de 2010

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7191
HENRY BURGESS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LYNN MARTIN; JAMES B. ELLISOR; JIM HODGES; CARROLL A.
CAMPBELL, JR.; WILLIAM DOUG CATOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:09-cv-01247-RBH)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina;
Steven Barry Johnson, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC,
Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Henry Burgess appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Burgess v. Martin, No.
4:09-cv-01247-RBH (D.S.C. July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.