Ramona Williams v. LISA BURGRESS, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals Service

10-6798Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 de ago. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6798
RAMONA WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LISA BURGRESS, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals
Service; DOE #2, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals
Service; DOE #3, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals
Service; DOE #4, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals
Service; DOE #5, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals
Service,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; UNKNOWN OFFICER OF UNTIED
STATES MARSHALS SERVICE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00115-REP)
Submitted: August 18, 2011 Decided: August 22, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ramona Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Ramona Williams appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice Williams’ civil rights action, and
a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v.
Burgress, No. 3:09-cv-00115-REP (E.D. Va. May 13, 2010; June 14,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.