Adrian Marion Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire Operations LLC

10-2208Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit4 de abr. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2208
ADRIAN MARION SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRIDGESTONE NORTH AMERICA TIRE OPERATIONS LLC; FORD MOTOR
COMPANY; RICHARDSON PATRIC WESTBROOK & BRICKMAN LLC LAW
FIRM; TERRY E. RICHARDSON, JR., Attorney; DONNIE HOWARD;
EDWARD J. WESTBROOK, Attorney; MICHAEL J. BRICKMAN,
Attorney; CHARLES W. PATRIC, JR., Attorney,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-01757-MBS)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian Marion Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Certiorari dismissed, October 3, 2011

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Adrian Marion Smith appeals from the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil action without prejudice and for lack of
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire
Operations, LLC, No. 1:10-cv-01757-MBS (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.