10-1315•Anthony Achoronye v. Prince George’s County
10-1315Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de out. de 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1315
ANTHONY ACHORONYE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-
cv-02528-RWT)
Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Achoronye, Appellant Pro Se. Rajeshanand Kumar, Maria
Katherine Patterson, PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Upper
Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM
Anthony Achoronye appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court from the bench. Achoronye v. Prince George’s Cnty., No.
8:09-cv-02528-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.