United States of America v. Rodney Wilson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7892
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODNEY WILSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (4:03-cr-70134-nkm-mfu-3)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Wilson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th
Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion
of the district court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724,
727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order
for the reasons stated there. See United States v. Wilson, No.
4:03-cr-70134-nkm-mfu-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --