Stanley Earl Winston v. Charlene Grice

09-6187Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de dez. de 2009

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6187
STANLEY EARL WINSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLENE GRICE,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA; PRESIDENT OF THE
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA; DEAN OF THE ARTS AND
SCIENCES DEPARTMENT; CHAIRMAN OF THE BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; CEO
OF THE MEDICAL DIVISION AT THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH
CAROLINA AT CHARLESTON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(3:06-cv-03567-TLW)
Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 2, 2009
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Earl Winston, Appellant Pro Se. Robin Lilley Jackson,
Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald, Sandra Jane Senn, SENN, MCDONALD &

-- 1 of 3 --

LEINBACK, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Earl Winston appeals from the district court’s
order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion to
reconsider the court’s previous denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find that
Winston has failed to establish the narrow grounds needed for
relief under Rule 60(b)(3). Great Coastal Express, Inc. v.
International Bhd. of Teamsters, 675 F.2d 1349, 1356 (4th Cir.
1982). Accordingly, we deny Winston’s emergency motion for
motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.